In a recent post, Adam Ard expresses his strong aversion to the Daily Scrum, a key component of the Scrum framework used in software development. He describes the experience as stressful and akin to micromanagement, where developers feel pressured to justify their daily activities. Ard highlights the inherent challenges in software development, where progress can be non-linear and often involves troubleshooting complex issues that may take significant time without visible results. He argues that the requirement for daily check-ins implies a lack of trust in developers, suggesting that it fosters an environment where individuals feel compelled to account for their time, leading to feelings of shame and frustration. Ard criticizes the common practice among Scrum Masters to treat these meetings as status updates, reinforcing the notion that developers need to be closely monitored. He believes that the Scrum framework, as it is often implemented, sends a message that developers are not trusted to manage their own work. Ard's perspective is that the Daily Scrum should not be a rigid check-in but rather a flexible opportunity for developers to coordinate their efforts. He calls for a rethinking of how these meetings are conducted, advocating for a structure that empowers developers rather than scrutinizes them. The discussion around the Daily Scrum reflects broader themes of trust, autonomy, and the dynamics of management in software development environments.